Publication Search
Chu, H., Luo, X., Ouyang, Z., Chan, W. S., Dengel, S., Biraud, S. C., Torn, M. S., Metzger, S., Kumar, J., Arain, M. A., Arkebauer, T. J., Baldocchi, D., Bernacchi, C., Billesbach, D., Black, T. A., Blanken, P. D., Bohrer, G., Bracho, R., Brown, S., Brunsell, N. A., Chen, J., Chen, X., Clark, K., Desai, A. R., Duman, T., Durden, D., Fares, S., Forbrich, I., Gamon, J. A., Gough, C. M., Griffis, T., Helbig, M., Hollinger, D., Humphreys, E., Ikawa, H., Iwata, H., Ju, Y., Knowles, J. F., Knox, S. H., Kobayashi, H., Kolb, T., Law, B., Lee, X., Litvak, M., Liu, H., Munger, J. W., Noormets, A., Novick, K., Oberbauer, S. F., Oechel, W., Oikawa, P., Papuga, S. A., Pendall, E., Prajapati, P., Prueger, J., Quinton, W. L., Richardson, A. D., Russell, E. S., Scott, R. L., Starr, G., Staebler, R., Stoy, P. C., Stuart-Haëntjens, E., Sonnentag, O., Sullivan, R. C., Suyker, A., Ueyama, M., Vargas, R., Wood, J. D., Zona, D.
Large datasets of greenhouse gas and energy surface-atmosphere fluxes measured with the eddy-covariance technique (e.g., FLUXNET2015, AmeriFlux BASE) are widely used to benchmark models and remote-sensing products. This study addresses one of the major challenges facing model-data integration: To what spatial extent do flux measurements …
Journal: Agricultural And Forest Meteorology, Volume 301-302: 108350 (2021), ISBN . DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108350 Sites: CA-ARB, CA-ARF, CA-Ca1, CA-Ca2, CA-Ca3, CA-Cbo, CA-DBB, CA-ER1, CA-Gro, CA-Let, CA-Man, CA-MR3, CA-MR5, CA-Na1, CA-NS1, CA-NS2, CA-NS3, CA-NS4, CA-NS5, CA-NS6, CA-NS7, CA-Oas, CA-Obs, CA-Ojp, CA-Qc2, CA-Qcu, CA-Qfo, CA-SCC, CA-SF1, CA-SF2, CA-SF3, CA-SJ2, CA-SJ3, CA-TP1, CA-TP3, CA-TP4, CA-TPD, CA-WP1, US-A03, US-A10, US-A32, US-A74, US-ADR, US-AR1, US-AR2, US-ARb, US-ARc, US-ARM, US-Aud, US-Bar, US-Bi1, US-Bi2, US-Bkg, US-Blk, US-Blo, US-Bn1, US-Bn2, US-Bn3, US-Bo1, US-Bo2, US-Br3, US-CaV, US-Ced, US-CF1, US-CF2, US-CF3, US-CF4, US-ChR, US-Cop, US-CPk, US-CRT, US-Ctn, US-Dia, US-Dix, US-Dk1, US-Dk2, US-Dk3, US-EDN, US-Elm, US-EML, US-Fmf, US-FPe, US-FR2, US-FR3, US-Fuf, US-Fwf, US-GLE, US-GMF, US-Goo, US-Ha1, US-Ha2, US-Hn2, US-Hn3, US-Ho1, US-Ho2, US-Ho3, US-IB1, US-IB2, US-Ivo, US-KFS, US-KLS, US-Kon, US-KS1, US-KS2, US-KUT, US-Lin, US-Los, US-LPH, US-LWW, US-Me1, US-Me2, US-Me3, US-Me4, US-Me5, US-Me6, US-MMS, US-MOz, US-Mpj, US-MRf, US-MtB, US-Myb, US-NC1, US-NC2, US-NC3, US-NC4, US-Ne1, US-Ne2, US-Ne3, US-NGB, US-NR1, US-Oho, US-ORv, US-PHM, US-Pon, US-Prr, US-RC1, US-RC2, US-RC3, US-RC4, US-RC5, US-Rls, US-Rms, US-Ro1, US-Ro2, US-Ro5, US-Ro6, US-Rpf, US-Rws, US-SdH, US-Seg, US-Ses, US-SFP, US-Shd, US-Skr, US-Slt, US-Snd, US-Sne, US-Snf, US-SO2, US-SO3, US-SO4, US-SP1, US-SP2, US-SP3, US-SRC, US-SRG, US-SRM, US-Srr, US-Sta, US-StJ, US-Syv, US-Ton, US-Tw1, US-Tw2, US-Tw3, US-Tw4, US-Tw5, US-Twt, US-Uaf, US-UMB, US-UMd, US-Var, US-Vcm, US-Vcp, US-Vcs, US-WBW, US-WCr, US-Wdn, US-Wgr, US-Whs, US-Wi0, US-Wi1, US-Wi3, US-Wi4, US-Wi5, US-Wi6, US-Wi7, US-Wi8, US-Wi9, US-Wjs, US-Wkg, US-Wlr, US-Wpp, US-WPT, US-Wrc, US-xBR, US-xCP, US-xDL, US-xHA, US-xKA, US-xKZ, US-xRM, US-xSR, US-xWD
Feagin, R. A., Forbrich, I., Huff, T. P., Barr, J. G., Ruiz‐Plancarte, J., Fuentes, J. D., Najjar, R. G., Vargas, R., Vázquez‐Lule, A., Windham‐Myers, L., Kroeger, K. D., Ward, E. J., Moore, G. W., Leclerc, M., Krauss, K. W., Stagg, C. L., Alber, M., Knox, S. H., Schäfer, K. V., Bianchi, T. S., Hutchings, J. A., Nahrawi, H., Noormets, A., Mitra, B., Jaimes, A., Hinson, A. L., Bergamaschi, B., King, J. S., Miao, G.
We mapped tidal wetland gross primary production (GPP) with unprecedented detail for multiple wetland types across the continental United States (CONUS) at 16‐day intervals for the years 2000–2019. To accomplish this task, we developed the spatially explicit Blue Carbon (BC) model, which combined tidal wetland cover and field‐based …
Journal: Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Volume 34 (2): (2020), ISBN . DOI: 10.1029/2019GB006349 Sites: US-GCE, US-HPY, US-LA1, US-NC4, US-PHM, US-PLM, US-Skr, US-Srr, US-StJ, US-VFP
Chu, H., Baldocchi, D. D., Poindexter, C., Abraha, M., Desai, A. R., Bohrer, G., Arain, M. A., Griffis, T., Blanken, P. D., O'Halloran, T. L., Thomas, R. Q., Zhang, Q., Burns, S. P., Frank, J. M., Christian, D., Brown, S., Black, T. A., Gough, C. M., Law, B. E., Lee, X., Chen, J., Reed, D. E., Massman, W. J., Clark, K., Hatfield, J., Prueger, J., Bracho, R., Baker, J. M., Martin, T. A.
Aerodynamic canopy height (ha) is the effective height of vegetation canopy for its influence on atmospheric fluxes and is a key parameter of surface‐atmosphere coupling. However, methods to estimate ha from data are limited. This synthesis evaluates the applicability and robustness of the calculation of ha from eddy covariance …
Journal: Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 45: 9275–9287 (2018), ISBN . DOI: 10.1029/2018GL079306 Sites: BR-Sa1, BR-Sa3, CA-Ca1, CA-Ca2, CA-Ca3, CA-Cbo, CA-ER1, CA-Gro, CA-Man, CA-NS1, CA-NS2, CA-NS3, CA-NS4, CA-NS5, CA-Oas, CA-Obs, CA-Ojp, CA-Qfo, CA-TP1, CA-TP3, CA-TP4, CA-TPD, US-Blo, US-Bn1, US-Bn2, US-Br1, US-Br3, US-Ced, US-CPk, US-CRT, US-Dix, US-Dk2, US-Dk3, US-Fmf, US-Fuf, US-GBT, US-GLE, US-GMF, US-Ha1, US-Ha2, US-Ho2, US-Ho3, US-IB1, US-IB2, US-KL1, US-KL2, US-KL3, US-KM1, US-KM2, US-KM3, US-KM4, US-Me2, US-Me3, US-Me4, US-Me5, US-Me6, US-MMS, US-MRf, US-NC1, US-NC2, US-Ne1, US-Ne2, US-Ne3, US-NR1, US-Oho, US-Prr, US-Ro1, US-Ro3, US-SB1, US-Shd, US-Skr, US-Slt, US-SP1, US-SP2, US-SP3, US-SRM, US-Srr, US-Syv, US-Ton, US-Tw3, US-Twt, US-UMB, US-UMd, US-Var, US-Vcm, US-WBW, US-Wi0, US-Wi1, US-Wi3, US-Wi4, US-Wi5, US-Wi8, US-Wi9, US-Wrc